Poems of Further Neglect

Well, I still can’t write.  Because reasons.  Lots of stuff stuck in my head.  But apathy.

Also, the upcoming move is kicking my ass.  Even though I’m not actually doing anything.  I kind of suspect that’s why I’m stuck in anhedonia-land.  It’s like some evil plot that mental illness likes to play: Need to get something done?  Tough!  Time to put on the brakes and completely paralyze and defeat you!  Whee!!!

Or rather: meh.

I feel like if I don’t post anything at all, I’ll completely lose momentum and also NO ONE WILL EVER READ ANYTHING I WRITE AGAIN.  Because melodrama.

So you get more poetry.  My poetry (sorry if you were hoping for something more clever).  These are from my book I Am Not These Things.  Which you can totally buy and I will be pennies richer.

~~

THE ACTRESS

There are times outside of the proscenium
When you, your tongue loosened by wine, and fire reflected in your eyes,
Become especially beautiful

Your laughter mirthful,
Alternating between throaty guffaws and the giddy giggles of guilty indulgence

You close space
And stop time

Spilling compliments and golden droplets of affection
To coat my palms And tuck into my heart’s back pocket

The waves of your hair, platinum mixed with straw
More often punished from view
Now resist constraint, twisted carelessly in a loose braid
Ready to swing away, unpartnered
Or perhaps only waiting for my fingers to cut in
And begin the dance

~~

BEAUTY

When you holler
Hey baby Hey baby
Looking good baby
Look over here, beautiful
Uh huh
Hey gorgeous

I get angry because
How do you know I’m beautiful
Just by looking at me

When you don’t even know me

~~

MOTHERS

I distinctly remember being much more mature for my age
When I was your age
And more respectful of my mother

Don’t believe your grandmother, though
Because she wasn’t nearly as understanding as I am
When she was my age
Back then

/rk

Advertisements

Let Me Entertain You, Damnit!

There’s an antagonism so often present in the relationship between artist and audience that I find incredibly discouraging and sometimes infuriating.  And I think it arises out of the notion that audiences see themselves as customers, rather than patrons.  After all, they’ve shelled out all this money to ‘purchase’ a product, and that product better damn well live up to expectations, right?

The scene is all too familiar.  The reluctant consumer arrives, scans the program, skeptically eyeing the credentials of the actors and crew, then crosses their arms as the lights go down, grimly tightening their jaw.  They set their minds to the notion that the performers will have to work for it – they will have to EARN their money.

areunotentertainedPlenty of artists will blame modern audiences, but it’s hardly a new phenomena.  Be it Rome’s deadly ‘bread and circuses’ or the tomato-throwing audiences of the Shakespeare’s Globe Theatre, there has always been a component of audiences that placed high demands on performers, with little or no appreciation to the creative process.

Process.  I feel that’s the key word that too often gets ignored.  There is far too much emphasis placed by the consumer on the final product.  Creation is a miracle of sorts.  That someone (or a group of someones) can transform something from their imagination into something tangible to share with the world is an amazing thing.  And sometimes, in looking at the final product, simply because it is ‘not our taste’ or not as we would have imagined it, that process is forgotten and unappreciated.

When it comes to theatre (or film, or any collaborative work, really), there is even more process.  Weeks, months or years go into developing a show.  There is laughter.  There are tears.  Every step along the way is a fight to get a cohesive vision that the company will try to communicate to the audience.

Creation is a battle.  A battle with one’s self to birth an idea.  And when it’s done, everyone looks at the baby and forgets the labour.

It’s very tempting as an artist to be disdainful of an an unreceptive audience.   “It went over their heads,” we’ll say, or speak dismissively of them as if they are somehow uneducated or unworthy.  It’s a hard thing to admit to ourselves, after all the blood, sweat and tears we’ve put in, that we simply didn’t connect.

There are performers, in the face of rejection, that say “Fuck it.  I perform for myself, and if they don’t like it, screw ’em.”  I think this is disingenuous.  An fundamental part of the creative process (if you’re going to earn a living, anyway) is connecting with your audience.

Does this mean pandering?  I don’t think so.  But I do think their needs to be a détente of sorts.  I think as performers we need to help audiences see themselves in the work.  I think we also need to help them connect to the process and let them know that they are a fundamental part of that process and our ability to create a successful experience.  That they are patrons and participants, not consumers.  Consumers devour.

We need audiences to be the fuel that both ignites the embers of creativity and stokes the flames as the fire burns brighter.

And we all need to learn that there is worth in the act of creation.  That even if the end product is not as we imagined it, or fails to hit the mark, that there is value in investing in the effort.

/rk